While PDFs are sometimes necessary, they often create significantly more accessibility work than other formats.
Accessible PDFs must meet two accessibility standards simultaneously:
-
WCAG 2.1 Level AA
-
PDF/UA (ISO 14289)
Because of these dual requirements, PDFs typically require substantially more remediation effort than Word or HTML content.
Why PDFs Take Longer to Remediate
Unlike Word or HTML documents, PDFs do not naturally contain clear structural information.
Accessibility specialists often must manually repair elements such as:
These repairs are typically performed after the document is created, rather than during creation.
Typical Remediation Time Comparison
While actual times vary depending on document complexity, accessibility teams commonly report the following general estimates:
| Document Type |
Typical Remediation Effort |
| Word document |
Low |
| HTML page |
Low |
| Tagged PDF |
Moderate |
| Untagged or poorly tagged PDF |
High |
| Scanned PDF |
Very High |
In many cases, a PDF can take 5–10 times longer to remediate than the same content created properly in Word or HTML.
Why Format Choice Matters
Choosing the correct format at the start can prevent unnecessary remediation work.
For example:
Instead of:
Use:
This approach:
Accessibility Best Practice
Use PDFs only when the format itself is essential, such as for:
For most other content:
This approach helps organizations maintain accessibility while reducing long-term remediation costs and effort.
Selecting the appropriate format before creating a document is one of the most effective ways to reduce accessibility remediation workload while improving access for all users.